Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 2024 Feb 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38362850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer (CC) is a public health concern with increasing incidence in younger populations. Treatment for locally advanced CC (LACC) involves oncological surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to reduce recurrence and improve overall survival (OS). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a novel approach for the treatment of LACC, and research is underway to explore its potential benefit in terms of survival. This trial will assess the efficacy of NAC in LACC. METHODS: This is a multicentre randomised, parallel-group, open label controlled clinical trial. Participants will be selected based on homogenous inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two treatment groups: NAC, surgery, and AC or surgery followed by AC. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary outcomes including 5-year PFS, 2- and 5-year OS, toxicity, radiological and pathological response, morbidity, and mortality. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will determine whether NAC induces a clinical and histological tumour response in patients with CCLA and if this treatment sequence improves survival without increasing morbidity and mortality. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04188158.

2.
Br J Surg ; 111(2)2024 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38381934

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to treat locally advanced (T3-4 Nx-2 M0) colon cancer due to its potential advantages over the standard approach of upfront surgery. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyse data from comparative studies to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on oncological outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search encompassed RCTs, propensity score-matched studies, and controlled prospective studies published up to 1 April 2023. As a primary objective, overall survival and disease-free survival were compared. As a secondary objective, perioperative morbidity, mortality, and complete resection were compared using the DerSimonian and Laird models. RESULTS: A total of seven studies comprising a total of 2120 patients were included. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a reduction in the hazard of recurrence (HR 0.73, 95% c.i. 0.59 to 0.90; P = 0.003) and death (HR 0.67, 95% c.i. 0.54 to 0.83; P < 0.001) compared with upfront surgery. Additionally, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with higher 5-year overall survival (79.9% versus 72.6%; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (73.1% versus 64.5%; P = 0.028) rates. No significant differences were observed in perioperative mortality (OR 0.97, 95% c.i. 0.28 to 3.33), overall complications (OR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.77 to 1.16), or anastomotic leakage/intra-abdominal abscess (OR 0.88, 95% c.i. 0.60 to 1.29). However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of incomplete resection (OR 0.70, 95% c.i. 0.49 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a reduced hazard of recurrence and death, as well as improved overall survival and disease-free survival rates, compared with upfront surgery in patients with locally advanced colon cancer.


Colon cancer is a common medical condition, the established treatment for which involves surgical resection followed by chemotherapy. However, a contemporary shift has led to the investigation of an alternative treatment sequence known as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, wherein chemotherapy precedes the surgery. This study critically assesses the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with the standard treatment approach of surgery followed by chemotherapy. A systematic review of medical databases was undertaken to identify pertinent research publications on this subject matter. In total, seven studies encompassing data from 2120 patients were included in the analysis. Employing a meta-analysis methodology to synthesize the collective data from these studies, it was revealed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was linked to higher rates of 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival, alongside a diminished hazard of both recurrence and death. Furthermore, no discernible differences in surgical complications or perioperative mortality were evident across the compared approaches.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia
4.
Updates Surg ; 75(8): 2191-2200, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37903996

RESUMO

To compare the rate of sphincter-saving interventions between transanal and laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in this particular group of patients. A multicentre observational study was conducted using a prospective database, including patients diagnosed with rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, who underwent minimally invasive elective surgery over a 5-year period. Exclusion criteria were (1) sphincter and/or puborectalis invasion; (2) multi-visceral resections; (3) palliative surgeries. The study population was divided into two groups according to the intervention: transanal or laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. The primary outcome was the rate of sphincter-saving surgery. Secondary outcomes included conversion, postoperative complications, quality of the specimen, and survival. A total of 93 patients were included; 40 (43%) transanal total mesorectal excision were compared to 53 (57%) laparoscopic. In addition, 35 cases of transanal approach were case-matched with an equal number of laparoscopic approaches, based on gender, tumor's height, and neoadjuvant therapy. In both groups, 43% of the patients had low rectal cancer; however, the rate of sphincter-saving surgery was significantly higher in the transanal group (97% vs. 71%, p = 0.003). There were no conversions to open surgery in the transanal group, compared to 2 cases in the laparoscopic group (6%) (p = 0.246). The percentage of major complications was similar, including the rate of anastomotic leakage (10% transanal vs. 19% laparoscopic, p = 0.835). In our experience, higher percentages of sphincter-saving procedures and lower conversion rates are potential benefits of using the transanal approach in a complex surgical setting population of obese patients with mid-low rectal tumors when compared to laparoscopic.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Protectomia , Neoplasias Retais , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , Humanos , Reto/cirurgia , Reto/patologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Tech Coloproctol ; 27(12): 1345-1350, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37770748

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Rectal cancer surgery presents challenges in achieving good oncological results and preserving functional outcomes. Different surgical approaches, including open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal techniques, have been employed, but there is a lack of consensus on the optimal approach, particularly in terms of functional results. This study aims to assess bowel function and to compare outcomes of patients that had undergone surgery for mid-low rectal cancer across different surgical approaches. METHOD: This is an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria are patients diagnosed with rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection, eligible for different surgical approaches for total mesorectal excision (TME). Data will be collected using validated questionnaires assessing bowel, sexual and urinary function, and quality of life (QOL). Secondary outcomes include short-term postoperative results. Data will be collected at baseline and 6, 12 and 24 months after index surgery or stoma reversal surgery. CONCLUSION: This study will provide insights into the impact of different approaches for TME on bowel, sexual and urinary function, and overall QOL of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. The findings will provide important information to optimise the surgical strategy and to improve patient care in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04936581 (registered 23 June 2021).


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Prospectivos , Reto/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto
6.
Sci Adv ; 9(39): eadi1328, 2023 09 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37756411

RESUMO

EGFR-ERK signaling controls cell cycle progression during development, homeostasis, and disease. While EGF ligand and mechanical inputs can activate EGFR-ERK signaling, the molecules linking mechanical force to this axis have remained mysterious. We previously found that stretch promotes mitosis via the stretch-activated ion channel Piezo1 and ERK signaling. Here, we show that Piezo1 provides the missing link between mechanical signals and EGFR-ERK activation. While both EGF- and Piezo1-dependent activation trigger clathrin-mediated EGFR endocytosis and ERK activation, EGF relies on canonical tyrosine autophosphorylation, whereas Piezo1 involves Src-p38 kinase-dependent serine phosphorylation. In addition, unlike EGF, ex vivo lung slices treated with Piezo1 agonist promoted cell cycle re-entry via nuclear ERK, AP-1 (FOS and JUN), and YAP accumulation, typical of regenerative and malignant signaling. Our results suggest that mechanical activation via Piezo1, Src, and p38 may be more relevant to controlling repair, regeneration, and cancer growth than tyrosine kinase signaling via canonical EGF signaling, suggesting an alternative therapeutic approach.


Assuntos
Fator de Crescimento Epidérmico , Transdução de Sinais , Fator de Crescimento Epidérmico/farmacologia , Quinases da Família src , Endocitose , Mitose , Receptores ErbB
7.
Int J Surg ; 109(4): 689-697, 2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37010145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are no specific recommendations regarding the optimal management of this group of patients. The World Society of Emergency Surgery suggested a nonoperative strategy with antibiotic therapy, but this was a weak recommendation. This study aims to identify the optimal management of patients with acute diverticulitis (AD) presenting with pericolic free air with or without pericolic fluid. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, international study of patients diagnosed with AD and pericolic-free air with or without pericolic free fluid at a computed tomography (CT) scan between May 2020 and June 2021 was included. Patients were excluded if they had intra-abdominal distant free air, an abscess, generalized peritonitis, or less than a 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was the rate of failure of nonoperative management within the index admission. Secondary outcomes included the rate of failure of nonoperative management within the first year and risk factors for failure. RESULTS: A total of 810 patients were recruited across 69 European and South American centers; 744 patients (92%) were treated nonoperatively, and 66 (8%) underwent immediate surgery. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Hinchey II-IV on diagnostic imaging was the only independent risk factor for surgical intervention during index admission (odds ratios: 12.5, 95% CI: 2.4-64, P =0.003). Among patients treated nonoperatively, at index admission, 697 (94%) patients were discharged without any complications, 35 (4.7%) required emergency surgery, and 12 (1.6%) percutaneous drainage. Free pericolic fluid on CT scan was associated with a higher risk of failure of nonoperative management (odds ratios: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.2-19.9, P =0.023), with 88% of success compared to 96% without free fluid ( P <0.001). The rate of treatment failure with nonoperative management during the first year of follow-up was 16.5%. CONCLUSION: Patients with AD presenting with pericolic free gas can be successfully managed nonoperatively in the vast majority of cases. Patients with both free pericolic gas and free pericolic fluid on a CT scan are at a higher risk of failing nonoperative management and require closer observation.


Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo , Diverticulite , Humanos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Diverticular do Colo/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36993671

RESUMO

Epithelial cells work collectively to provide a protective barrier, yet also turn over rapidly by cell death and division. If the number of dying cells does not match those dividing, the barrier would vanish, or tumors can form. Mechanical forces and the stretch-activated ion channel (SAC) Piezo1 link both processes; stretch promotes cell division and crowding triggers cell death by initiating live cell extrusion1,2. However, it was not clear how particular cells within a crowded region are selected for extrusion. Here, we show that individual cells transiently shrink via water loss before they extrude. Artificially inducing cell shrinkage by increasing extracellular osmolarity is sufficient to induce cell extrusion. Pre-extrusion cell shrinkage requires the voltage-gated potassium channels Kv1.1 and Kv1.2 and the chloride channel SWELL1, upstream of Piezo1. Activation of these voltage-gated channels requires the mechano-sensitive Epithelial Sodium Channel, ENaC, acting as the earliest crowd-sensing step. Imaging with a voltage dye indicated that epithelial cells lose membrane potential as they become crowded and smaller, yet those selected for extrusion are markedly more depolarized than their neighbours. Loss of any of these channels in crowded conditions causes epithelial buckling, highlighting an important role for voltage and water regulation in controlling epithelial shape as well as extrusion. Thus, ENaC causes cells with similar membrane potentials to slowly shrink with compression but those with reduced membrane potentials to be eliminated by extrusion, suggesting a chief driver of cell death stems from insufficient energy to maintain cell membrane potential.

9.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(4)2023 Feb 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36834938

RESUMO

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC; age younger than 50 years) incidence has been steadily increasing in recent decades worldwide. The need for new biomarkers for EOCRC prevention strategies is undeniable. In this study, we aimed to explore whether an aging factor, such as telomere length (TL), could be a useful tool in EOCRC screening. The absolute leukocyte TL from 87 microsatellite stable EOCRC patients and 109 healthy controls (HC) with the same range of age, was quantified by Real Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Then, leukocyte whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to study the status of the genes involved in TL maintenance (hTERT, TERC, DKC1, TERF1, TERF2, TERF2IP, TINF2, ACD, and POT1) in 70 sporadic EOCRC cases from the original cohort. We observed that TL was significantly shorter in EOCRC patients than in healthy individuals (EOCRC mean: 122 kb vs. HC mean: 296 kb; p < 0.001), suggesting that telomeric shortening could be associated with EOCRC susceptibility. In addition, we found a significant association between several SNPs of hTERT (rs79662648), POT1 (rs76436625, rs10263573, rs3815221, rs7794637, rs7784168, rs4383910, and rs7782354), TERF2 (rs251796 and rs344152214), and TERF2IP (rs7205764) genes and the risk of developing EOCRC. We consider that the measurement of germline TL and the status analysis of telomere maintenance related genes polymorphisms at early ages could be non-invasive methods that could facilitate the early identification of individuals at risk of developing EOCRC.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Telômero , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Incidência , Telômero/genética , Telômero/metabolismo , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos
10.
Tech Coloproctol ; 26(9): 745-753, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35637355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present case-series describes the first full-robotic colorectal resections performed with the new CMR Versius platform (Cambridge Medical Robotics Surgical, 1 Evolution Business Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom) by an experienced robotic surgeon. METHODS: In a period between July 2020 and December 2020, patients aged 18 years or older, who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer and were fit for minimally invasive surgery, underwent robotic colorectal resection with CMR Versius robotic platform at "Casa di Cura Cobellis" in Vallo della Lucania,Salerno, Italy. Three right colectomies, 2 sigmoid colectomies and 1 anterior rectal resection were performed. All the procedures were planned as fully robotic. Surgical data were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database. RESULTS: Four patients were male and 2 patients were female with a median (range) age of 66 (47-72) years. One covering ileostomy was created. Full robotic splenic flexure mobilization was performed. No additional laparoscopic gestures or procedures were performed in this series except for clipping and stapling which were performed by the assistant surgeon due to the absence of robotic dedicated instruments. Two ileocolic anastomoses, planned as robotic-sewn, were performed extracorporeally. One Clavien-Dindo II complication occurred due to a postoperative blood transfusion. Median total operative time was 160 (145-294) min for right colectomies, 246 (191-300) min for sigmoid colectomies and 250 min for the anterior rectal resection. CONCLUSIONS: The present series confirms the feasibility of full-robotic colorectal resections while highlighting the strengths and the limitations of the CMR Versius platform in colorectal surgery. New devices will need more clinical development to be comparable to the current standard.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Cirurgia Colorretal , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
11.
Colorectal Dis ; 24(5): 659-663, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35038374

RESUMO

AIM: The aim was to describe the range of possibilities and our group's clinical outcomes when performing different types of anastomosis during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed based on four taTME series from 2016 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients with rectal cancer in whom a sphincter-saving low anterior resection by taTME was performed. Four different techniques were employed for the anastomosis construction: (A) abdominal view, (B) transanal view, (C) hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis and (D) pull-through. Intra-operative and postoperative data were collected and compared. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included. Tumour height was lower in groups C and D (4 [3-5] vs. 7 [6-8] group A vs. 6 [5-7] group B, P = 0.000), requiring a hand-sewn anastomosis. A transanal extraction of the specimen was more commonly performed in groups C and D (over 60% vs. 30% in groups A and B, P = 0.000). The rate of temporary stoma was similar between groups A, B and C (ranging from 84% to 98%) but was significantly lower in group D (P = 0.000). The overall rate of complications was similar between groups; however, group D had longer length of stay (15 days vs. 5-6 in groups A, B and C, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Every type of anastomosis construction after a taTME procedure seems to be safe and feasible and should be chosen based on surgeon's experience, tumour height and the length of the rectal cuff after the rectal transection. Colorectal surgeons should be familiar with these techniques in order to choose the one that benefits each patient the most.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Retais , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos
12.
Cir Cir ; 89(S2): 80-83, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34932541

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is a serious complication of rectal cancer surgery that leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Its incidence is 3-21%, usually appearing 5-7 days after surgery, although there are cases of late presentation as chronic anastomotic fistulas or sinuses. CASE REPORT: We present three cases of patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer and developed necrotizing fasciitis due to late anastomotic leaks. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that early and resolutive surgical treatment is recommended for chronic anastomotic fistulas or sinuses, even when asymptomatic, because of the associated risk of necrotizing fasciitis.


ANTECEDENTES: La dehiscencia anastomótica es una complicación grave de la cirugía del cáncer de recto que conlleva un aumento de la morbimortalidad. Su incidencia se sitúa en un 3-21%, manifestándose habitualmente alrededor del quinto a séptimo días de posoperatorio, si bien existen casos de presentación tardía en forma de fístulas o sinus anastomóticos crónicos. CASOS CLÍNICOS: Presentamos tres casos de pacientes intervenidos mediante resección anterior por cáncer de recto que desarrollaron fascitis necrotizante secundaria a dehiscencia anastomótica tardía. CONCLUSIONES: Creemos recomendable el tratamiento quirúrgico resolutivo y precoz de las fístulas y sinus anastomóticos crónicos, incluso asintomáticos, por el potencial riesgo de fascitis necrotizante que suponen.


Assuntos
Fasciite Necrosante , Neoplasias Retais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Colectomia , Fasciite Necrosante/etiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 32(1): 28-34, 2021 Aug 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34369479

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer. Rates of conversion to open surgery range between 7% and 30% and controversy exists as to the effect of this on oncologic outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze what factors are predictive of conversion and what effect they have on oncologic outcomes. METHODS: From a prospective database of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between 2000 and 2018 a univariate and multivariate analyses were made of demographic, pathologic, and surgical variables together with complementary treatments comparing purely laparoscopic resection with conversions to open surgery. Overall and disease-free survival were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of a total of 829 patients, 43 (5.18%) converted to open surgery. In the univariate analysis, 12 variables were significantly associated with conversion, of which left-sided resection [odds ratio (OR): 2.908; P=0.02], resection of the rectum (OR: 4.749, P=0.014), and local invasion of the tumor (OR: 6.905, P<0.01) were independently predictive factors in the multiple logistic regression. Female sex was associated with fewer conversions (OR: 0.375, P=0.012). The incidence and pattern of relapses were similar in both groups and there were no significant differences between overall and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Left-sided resections, resections of the rectum and tumor invasion of neighboring structures are associated with higher rates of conversion. Female sex is associated with fewer conversions. Conversion to open surgery does not compromise oncologic outcomes at 5 and 10 years.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Laparoscopia , Colectomia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Updates Surg ; 73(6): 2161-2168, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34143398

RESUMO

We aim to analyze differences in compliance between colon and rectal cancer surgeries under Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for colorectal procedures, and to detect implementation barriers for rectal cancer surgeries. Patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgeries under ERAS were case-matched based on gender, age, and P-POSSUM with an equal number of patients who underwent colonic surgeries. Achievements of ≥ 70% of ERAS items were considered an acceptable level of compliance. A multivariate analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for lower compliance. A total of 434 patients were included over a 5-year period. After matching, there were 111 patients in each group. Overall compliance was significantly lower in the rectal surgery group (73% vs 82%, p = 0.001). A good compliance rate differed from 55% in rectal vs 77.5% in colonic procedures (p = 0.000). We identified three independent risk factors for lower compliance rates: open surgical approach, the use of epidural catheter, and the presence of postoperative ileus. Our data showed that rectal cancer surgeries are more exigent to success on ERAS interventions when compared to colonic resections. There is a need to introduce specific modifications on the protocols for colorectal surgeries when applied to these particular procedures.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia
15.
Nature ; 593(7860): 591-596, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33953402

RESUMO

Cell extrusion is a mechanism of cell elimination that is used by organisms as diverse as sponges, nematodes, insects and mammals1-3. During extrusion, a cell detaches from a layer of surrounding cells while maintaining the continuity of that layer4. Vertebrate epithelial tissues primarily eliminate cells by extrusion, and the dysregulation of cell extrusion has been linked to epithelial diseases, including cancer1,5. The mechanisms that drive cell extrusion remain incompletely understood. Here, to analyse cell extrusion by Caenorhabditis elegans embryos3, we conducted a genome-wide RNA interference screen, identified multiple cell-cycle genes with S-phase-specific function, and performed live-imaging experiments to establish how those genes control extrusion. Extruding cells experience replication stress during S phase and activate a replication-stress response via homologues of ATR and CHK1. Preventing S-phase entry, inhibiting the replication-stress response, or allowing completion of the cell cycle blocked cell extrusion. Hydroxyurea-induced replication stress6,7 triggered ATR-CHK1- and p53-dependent cell extrusion from a mammalian epithelial monolayer. We conclude that cell extrusion induced by replication stress is conserved among animals and propose that this extrusion process is a primordial mechanism of cell elimination with a tumour-suppressive function in mammals.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/genética , Replicação do DNA , Morte Celular Regulada , Fase S , Animais , Proteínas Mutadas de Ataxia Telangiectasia , Caenorhabditis elegans/citologia , Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular , Quinase 1 do Ponto de Checagem , Dano ao DNA , Cães , Embrião não Mamífero , Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Células Madin Darby de Rim Canino , Interferência de RNA
16.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 31(5): 558-564, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840737

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection is the ideal treatment of colon cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the predictive factors for postoperative complications and their impact on oncologic outcomes in laparoscopic resections in colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery the number and degree of severity of postoperative complications were recorded and classified according to Clavien-Dindo. A univariate analysis was made of the demographic, surgical, and oncologic variables of patients with and without complications. The statistically significant variables were then entered into a multivariate model. In both groups overall and disease-free survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Of 524 patients, 138 (26.3%) experienced some type of complication, 110 less severe (79.7%) and 28 (20.4%) severe. Twenty-nine conversions to open surgery occurred (5.5%) and hospital mortality was 0.2%.In the multivariate analysis, use of corticosteroids [odds ratio (OR): 3.619], oral anticoagulants (OR: 3.49), blood transfusions (OR: 4.30), and conversion to open surgery (OR: 3.93) were significantly associated with the development of complications. However, sigmoid resections were associated with fewer complications (OR: 0.45).Overall 5-year and 10-year survival in both groups, was 83.3%, 74.1%, 76.0%, and 67.1%, respectively (P=0.18). Disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years, excluding stage IV tumors, was 88.6% and 90.4%, respectively (P=0.881). CONCLUSIONS: The use of corticosteroids, oral anticoagulants, blood transfusions, and conversion to open surgery are all independent predictive factors of postoperative complications. Sigmoid resections are associated with fewer complications. In laparoscopic resections of the colon, complications do not negatively affect long-term oncologic outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Laparoscopia , Colectomia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Surg Endosc ; 35(4): 1808-1819, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the gold standard technique for rectal cancer as Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) may be safely performed either by open or minimally invasive surgery. The laparoscopic approach, however, may carry technical difficulties. For this reason, a novel technique has emerged in the last decade combining a dual laparoscopic dissection (abdominal and transanal) to perform the TME technique (TaTME). When focusing on oncological outcomes, there is a lack of literature regarding mid-long term results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the mid-term oncological impact of TaTME for treating rectal cancer. METHODS: A prospective multicentre study was performed in four tertiary centres including consecutive patients who underwent TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer by the same group of experienced surgeons. The analysed data included pathological results on the quality of TME and mid-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 173 patients were included throughout a study period of 6 years. Our series included 70% males and 68% of patients with neoadjuvant treatments. The median follow-up was 23 [15-37.5] months. Regarding pathological results, a complete TME was achieved in 72.8%, while circumferential and distal margins were affected in 1.4 and 1.1%, respectively. Five patients developed local recurrences (3%) and 8.1% presented distant disease during the follow-up. The 2-year disease-free survival and the overall survival rates were 88% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently a lack of evidence in the literature regarding TaTME and oncological outcomes with no data available from randomized clinical trials. In the meantime, the reported results from different multicentre series are controversial. This study showed positive mid-term outcomes at 2 years of follow-up and supported notable oncological outcomes with TaTME. However, it must be emphasized that previous experience in minimally invasive and transanal surgeries is essential for surgeons before intending to perform TaTME.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 113(2): 85-91, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33261501

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: the aim of the study was to analyze the management of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients diagnosed with CRC or undergoing elective surgery during the period of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a multicenter ambispective analysis was performed in nine centers in Spain during a four-month period. Data were collected from every patient, including changes in treatments, referrals or delays in surgeries, changes in surgical approaches, postoperative outcomes and perioperative SARS-CoV-2 status. The hospital's response to the outbreak and available resources were categorized, and outcomes were divided into periods based on the timeline of the pandemic. RESULTS: a total of 301 patients were included by the study centers and 259 (86 %) underwent surgery. Five hospitals went into phase III during the peak of incidence period, one remained in phase II and three in phase I. More than 60 % of patients suffered some form of change: 48 % referrals, 39 % delays, 4 % of rectal cancer patients had a prolonged interval to surgery and 5 % underwent neoadjuvant treatment. At the time of study closure, 3 % did not undergo surgery. More than 85 % of the patients were tested preoperatively for SARS-CoV-2. A total of nine patients (3 %) developed postoperative pneumonia; three of them had confirmed SARS-CoV-2. The observed surgical complications and mortality rates were similar as expected in a usual situation. CONCLUSIONS: the present multicenter study shows different patterns of response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and collateral effects in managing CRC patients. Knowing these patterns could be useful for planning future changes in surgical departments in preparation for new outbreaks.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA